Roumanian adaptation of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: The examination of validity and reliability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24837/pru.v7i1.402Keywords:
organizational well-being, work engagement, factor analysis, validityAbstract
The purpose of this study was to validate the Romanian version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-R). The study was developed in three phases: (1) adaptation for Romanian language of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (17 item version and 9 item version) (Shaufeli & Bakker, 2003); (2) a comparative analysis of the two scales; (3) a validity analysis for UWES-9 on Romanian population. The factor structure for the two scales was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The results indicate that the fit indices for UWES-17 are lower than for UWES-9. The comparative analysis of the results indicate that UWES-9 is, generally, more adequate to be used in Romanian organizations. The internal consistency of the UWES-9 scales have values between .70 and .80 and the consistency for the unique factor is almost .90 that suggests a better adequacy for the single factor model. The construct validity analysis shows that work engagement is related to personality dimensions, organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors, organizational justice and job content aspects. The results support the reliability and validity aspects for the tested instrument.
Downloads
References
Bakker, A.B., Schaufeli, W.B., Leiter, M.P., & Taris, T.W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work and Stress, 22 (3), 187-200.
Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44,1-26.
Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., & Strauss, J.P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715-722.
Bennett, R.J., & Robinson, S.L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (3), 349-360.
Blickle, G. (1996). Personality traits, learning strategies, and performance. European Journal of Personality, 10, 337-352.
Bolchover, D. (2006). Morții vii. Rupți de lume, dusi dintre noi: crudul adevăr despre viața de birou. Bucuresti: Codecs.
Brief, A.P., Burke, M.J., George, J.M., Robinson, B.S.., & Webster, J. (1988). Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 193-189.
Burke, W.W. (1994). Organizational Development: A Process of Learning and Changing, (2ed.). Cranbury: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
Busato, V.V., Prins, F.J., Elshout, J.J., & Hamaker, C. (1999). The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits, and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 129-140.
Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C.L. (1993). The psychological impact of merger and aquisitions on the individual: A study of building society managers. Human Relations, 46, 327-347.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 386-400.
Cooper, C.L., Kirkaldz, B.D., & Brown, J. (1994). A model of job stress and physical health: The role of individual differences. Personality & Individual Differences, 16, 653-655.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding Flow. Psychology Today, 30, 46-51.
Fox, S., & Spector, P. (2002). Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist. Găsit la adresa http://chuma.usf.edu/~spector/scales/ la data de 11 aprilie 2006.
Fox, S., Spector, P.E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) in Response to Job Stresors and Organizational Justice: Some Mediator and Moderator Tests for Autonomy and Emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309.
Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81-103.
Hallberg, U.E., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2006). "Same same" but different? Can work engagement be discriminated from job involvement and organizational commitment. European Psychologist, 11 (2), 119-127.
Harrison, D.A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P.L. (2006). How important are job atitudes? Metaanalytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 305-325.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693-710.
Karaseck, R.A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 265-308.
Kawakami, N., Kobayashi, F., Araki, S., Haratani, T., & Furui, H. (1995). Assessment of job stress dimensions based on the Job Demands-Control Model of employees of telecommunication and electrical power companies in Japan: Relability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Job Content Questionnaire, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2(4), 358-375.
Kristensen, T.S. (1995). The demand-controlsupport model: Methodological challenges for future research, Stress Medicine, 11, 17-26.
Kristensen, T.S. (1996). Job stress and cardiovascular disease: A theoretical critical review, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(3), 246-260.
Langelaan, S., Bakker, A.B., Van Doornen L. J. P., & Shaufeli, W. B. (2006). Bournout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? Personality and individual differences, 40, 521-532.
Lee, K., & Allen, N. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (1), 131-142.
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (p. 1297-1349). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Macey, W.H., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee engagement dependent upon conditions created by employer. Psychology & Psychiatry Journal via NewsRx.com, Atlanta, Wiley-Blackwell, p.21.
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). The Maslach Burnout Inventory (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W.B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job Burnout. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
Moliner, C., Martinez-Tur, V., Ramos, J., Piero, JM., & Cropanzano, R. (2008). Organizational justice and extrarole customer service: The mediating role of well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 227-238.
Myers, D. G. (2000). The funds, friends and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55, 56-67.
Newman, D.A., & Harrison, D.A. (2008). Been There, Bottled That: Are State and Behavioral Work Engagement New and Useful Construct "Wine"? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 31-35.
Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
Pitariu, H., Vîrg?, D., Sulea, C., & Zaboril?, C. (2008). Implicații ale climatului organizațional contraproductiv vs. suportiv asupra sănătății psihologice a angajaților. Lucrare prezentată la Conferința Națională de Psihologie "Dialog pentru diversitate", 23-25 mai, Timisoara.
Posdakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Paine, B., & Bachrach, D. (2000). Organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26 (3), 513-563.
Sackett, P.R., & De Vore, C.J. (2006). Contraproductive Behaviors at Work. In Viswesvarand, C., Sinangil, Ones, D.S. and Anderson, N. (ed.) Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology (vol.1, p.145-164). London: Sage Publications.
Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiro, J.M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediating role of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217-1227.
Sava, F.A. (2004). Analiza datelor in cercetarea psihologica. Metode statistice complementare. Cluj Napoca: Editura ASCR.
Sava, F.A. (coord.) (2008). Inventarul de personalitate DECAS. Manual de utilizare. Timisoara: ArtPress.
Schaufeli, W, B., Salanova, M., Gonzales-Roma, V., & Bakker, A.B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A.B. (2003). Test manual for the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.schaufeli.com.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A.B., & Salanova, M., (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716.
Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I., Marques-Pinto, A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464-481.
Schaufeli, W.B., Taris, T.W., & van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57 (2), 173-203.
Schnall, P.L., Landsbergis, P.A., & Baker, D. (1994). Job strain and cardiovascular disease. Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 15, 381-411.
Shaufeli,W.B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Work engagement: An Emerging Psychological Concept and Its Implications for Organizations, In Gilliland, S.W., Steiner, D.D., & Starlicki, D.P. (Eds.), Reserch in Social Issues in Management (Volume 5): Managing Social and Etichal Issues in Organization (p.135-177). Greenwich: Information Age Publishers.
Spector, P.E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. in S. Fox si P.E. Spector (coord.) Counterproductive work behavior: investigations of actors and targets (p. 151-176). Washington DC: American Pscychological Association.
Spector, P.E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruusema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006).The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 446-460.
Spielberger, C.D. (1988). STAXI-2. State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. Test cu licență D&D/TestCentral.
Spielberger, C.D. (1983). STAI. State-trait anxiety inventory. Test cu licență D&D/TestCentral.
Sulea, C. (2004). Latura întunecată a organizațiilor: comportamentul contraproductiv la locul de muncă. Psihologia resurselor umane, 2 (2), 60-68.
Tetrick, L.E., & Quick, J.C. (2003). Prevention at work: Public health in occupational setting. In J.C. Quick & L.E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (p.3-18). Washington, DC: American Pscychological Association.
Van Katwyk, P.T., Fox, S., Spector, P.E., & Kelloway, E.K. (2000). Using the Job Affective Well Being Scale (Jaws) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 219-230.
Viswesvaran, C, & Ones, D.S. (2005). Job performance assessment. In Evers, A., Anderson, N., Voskuijl, O., (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection, Oxford: Blackwell.
Vîrg?, D., Zaboril?, C., & Sulea, C. (2008). Sănătatea psihologică în organizații. In Avram, E. & Cooper, C. (coord.) Psihologie organizational-managerială. Tendințe actuale (pp.343-366), Iasi: Polirom.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
Zimet, G.D., Dahlem, N.W., Zimet, S.G., & Farley, G.K. (1998). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal,it also allows for use of the work for non-commercial purposes and if others remix, transform or build upon the works found in this journal they must distribute the contributions under the same licence as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See: The Effect of Open Access).