https://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/issue/feedPsihologia Resurselor Umane2025-12-21T16:45:05+02:00Ana-Maria Cazanana.cazan@unitbv.roOpen Journal Systems<p><img style="float: left;" src="https://www.hrp-journal.com/public/site/images/copariuc/magazine-demo.png" alt="PRU" /></p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The <strong>Psihologia Resurselor Umane Journal</strong> is the official journal of the <a href="http://www.apio.ro/"><strong>Association of Industrial and Organizational Psychology</strong></a> (APIO). PRU is devoted to publishing original investigations that contribute to an understanding of situational and individual challenges within an organizational context and that bring forth new knowledge in the field. The journal publishes primarily empirical articles and also welcomes methodological and theoretical articles on a broad range of topics covered by Organizational, Industrial, Work, Personnel and Occupational Health Psychology.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">Audience includes scholars, educators, managers, HR professionals, organizational consultants, practitioners in organizational and employee development. This journal is currently abstracted and indexed in the following databases: PsychINFO, Proquest, ERIH +, EBSCO, Scopus, DOAJ and Copernicus. Examples of topics covered in this journal are: job demands and resources, work stress, employee well-being, employee, positive and negative work behaviors, work-family conflict, personality in work contexts, leadership, job attitudes, HR practices, work motivation, personal resources, team effectiveness, employee performance, methods in I/O psychology.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Editor:</strong> Ana-Maria Cazan</p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Print ISSN:</strong> 1583 -7327</p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Electronic ISSN</strong>: 2392 - 8077 </p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Published two times a year in June and December</em></p>https://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/609The Economic Value of Industrial-Organizational Psychology2025-10-19T19:32:24+03:00Bogdan Opreabogdan.oprea@fpse.unibuc.ro2025-12-21T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2025 Psihologia Resurselor Umanehttps://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/601Leaders’ Dark Tetrad and their effectiveness: An analysis of the curvilinear relationships mediated by team members’ knowledge-sharing behaviors2025-08-21T21:42:01+03:00Diana Ioana Popadianapopa23dip@gmail.comClaudia Lenuța Rusclaudiarus@psychology.roCătălina Oțoiucatalinaotoiu@psychology.ro<p>This study examined how leaders’ Dark Tetrad traits - narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism - relate to perceived leadership effectiveness, and whether team members’ knowledge-sharing behaviors mediate these associations. Curvilinear regression analyses conducted with a sample of 217 employees revealed that narcissism exhibited an inverted U-shaped relationship with leadership effectiveness. In contrast, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism were only negatively and linearly associated with leader effectiveness. Regarding knowledge-sharing, sadism demonstrated a significant curvilinear (U-shaped) relationship, while other traits yielded either weak or non-significant patterns. Knowledge-sharing itself followed an inverted U-shape curvilinear path in predicting leadership effectiveness. Knowledge-sharing behaviors did not mediate the relationship between Dark Tetrad traits and leadership effectiveness. These findings suggest that dark traits may display context-dependent adaptability, particularly at moderate levels, challenging traditional linear models in leadership research. They highlight the role of nonlinear dynamics in effective leadership. Limits and future directions are presented.</p>2025-12-21T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2025 Psihologia Resurselor Umanehttps://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/608Age or Generation? How Occupational Stress Shapes Satisfaction, Commitment, and Turnover Intentions2025-10-13T00:04:42+03:00Antonia Antohihoria.moasa@unitbv.roHoria Moașahoria.moasa@unitbv.ro<p>This study examines how occupational stress shapes employee well-being and withdrawal intentions across age and generational groups in a Romanian engineering company. Drawing on job demands–resources, conservation of resources, and lifespan perspectives, we tested a model linking stress, emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention. Using validated scales and survey data from 93 employees representing Generations X, Y, and Z, we combined regression and PROCESS analyses to evaluate direct, mediating, and moderating relationships. Findings show that stress undermines key attitudes and increases withdrawal risk, with emotional exhaustion and commitment playing central explanatory roles. While generational differences emerged, many effects were better explained by linear age. The study advances understanding of stress–strain processes and their implications for retention.</p>2025-12-21T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2025 Psihologia Resurselor Umanehttps://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/596A New Version of the Evaluation of Motivational Persistence (EPM) Questionnaire: Conceptual Grounding and Empirical Support2025-10-19T18:43:13+03:00Ticu Constantintconst@uaic.roGabriela Nicuțăgabriela.nicuta@yahoo.com<p>This study reports on a revised version of the Evaluation of Motivational Persistence questionnaire, expanding the original three-factor model by adding Ambition, Planning, and Self-discipline subscales. Psychometric properties were evaluated in two convenience samples totaling 3,875 participants. The subscales demonstrated generally good internal consistency and composite reliability, although Ambition and Self-discipline were slightly lower, indicating areas for improvement. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a five-factor factorial structure, suggesting that the Recurrence of unattained goals subscale should be eliminated. Measurement invariance across gender was also tested and received support. Convergent validity was assessed using average variance extracted and discriminant validity was examined via the Fornell–Larcker criterion, with most subscales meeting criteria, while a few subscale pairs displayed overlap that warrants further examination. Construct validity was further supported by correlations with established measures. While the instrument demonstrates promise for research and applied settings, additional work is required to strengthen its psychometric properties.</p>2025-12-21T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2025 Psihologia Resurselor Umane