Psihologia Resurselor Umane
https://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru
<p><img style="float: left;" src="https://www.hrp-journal.com/public/site/images/copariuc/magazine-demo.png" alt="PRU" /></p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The <strong>Psihologia Resurselor Umane Journal</strong> is the official journal of the <a href="http://www.apio.ro/"><strong>Association of Industrial and Organizational Psychology</strong></a> (APIO). PRU is devoted to publishing original investigations that contribute to an understanding of situational and individual challenges within an organizational context and that bring forth new knowledge in the field. The journal publishes primarily empirical articles and also welcomes methodological and theoretical articles on a broad range of topics covered by Organizational, Industrial, Work, Personnel and Occupational Health Psychology.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">Audience includes scholars, educators, managers, HR professionals, organizational consultants, practitioners in organizational and employee development. This journal is currently abstracted and indexed in the following databases: PsychINFO, Proquest, ERIH +, EBSCO, Scopus, DOAJ and Copernicus. Examples of topics covered in this journal are: job demands and resources, work stress, employee well-being, employee, positive and negative work behaviors, work-family conflict, personality in work contexts, leadership, job attitudes, HR practices, work motivation, personal resources, team effectiveness, employee performance, methods in I/O psychology.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Editor:</strong> Ana-Maria Cazan</p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Print ISSN:</strong> 1583 -7327</p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Electronic ISSN</strong>: 2392 - 8077 </p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Published two times a year in June and December</em></p>Asociația de Psihologie Industriala și Organizaționalăen-USPsihologia Resurselor Umane1583-7327<p style="color: #000000; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:</p> <ul style="color: #000000; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"> <li>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0//">Creative Commons Attribution License</a> that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal,it also allows for use of the work for non-commercial purposes and if others remix, transform or build upon the works found in this journal they must distribute the contributions under the same licence as the original.</li> <li>Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.</li> <li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See: <a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_new">The Effect of Open Access</a>).</li> </ul>The Economic Value of Industrial-Organizational Psychology
https://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/609
Bogdan Oprea
Copyright (c) 2025 Psihologia Resurselor Umane
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2025-12-212025-12-2123210.24837/pru.v23i2.609Leaders’ Dark Tetrad and their effectiveness: An analysis of the curvilinear relationships mediated by team members’ knowledge-sharing behaviors
https://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/601
<p>This study examined how leaders’ Dark Tetrad traits - narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism - relate to perceived leadership effectiveness, and whether team members’ knowledge-sharing behaviors mediate these associations. Curvilinear regression analyses conducted with a sample of 217 employees revealed that narcissism exhibited an inverted U-shaped relationship with leadership effectiveness. In contrast, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism were only negatively and linearly associated with leader effectiveness. Regarding knowledge-sharing, sadism demonstrated a significant curvilinear (U-shaped) relationship, while other traits yielded either weak or non-significant patterns. Knowledge-sharing itself followed an inverted U-shape curvilinear path in predicting leadership effectiveness. Knowledge-sharing behaviors did not mediate the relationship between Dark Tetrad traits and leadership effectiveness. These findings suggest that dark traits may display context-dependent adaptability, particularly at moderate levels, challenging traditional linear models in leadership research. They highlight the role of nonlinear dynamics in effective leadership. Limits and future directions are presented.</p>Diana Ioana PopaClaudia Lenuța RusCătălina Oțoiu
Copyright (c) 2025 Psihologia Resurselor Umane
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2025-12-212025-12-2123210.24837/pru.v23i2.601Age or Generation? How Occupational Stress Shapes Satisfaction, Commitment, and Turnover Intentions
https://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/608
<p>This study examines how occupational stress shapes employee well-being and withdrawal intentions across age and generational groups in a Romanian engineering company. Drawing on job demands–resources, conservation of resources, and lifespan perspectives, we tested a model linking stress, emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention. Using validated scales and survey data from 93 employees representing Generations X, Y, and Z, we combined regression and PROCESS analyses to evaluate direct, mediating, and moderating relationships. Findings show that stress undermines key attitudes and increases withdrawal risk, with emotional exhaustion and commitment playing central explanatory roles. While generational differences emerged, many effects were better explained by linear age. The study advances understanding of stress–strain processes and their implications for retention.</p>Antonia AntohiHoria Moașa
Copyright (c) 2025 Psihologia Resurselor Umane
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2025-12-212025-12-2123210.24837/pru.v23i2.608A New Version of the Evaluation of Motivational Persistence (EPM) Questionnaire: Conceptual Grounding and Empirical Support
https://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/596
<p>This study reports on a revised version of the Evaluation of Motivational Persistence questionnaire, expanding the original three-factor model by adding Ambition, Planning, and Self-discipline subscales. Psychometric properties were evaluated in two convenience samples totaling 3,875 participants. The subscales demonstrated generally good internal consistency and composite reliability, although Ambition and Self-discipline were slightly lower, indicating areas for improvement. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a five-factor factorial structure, suggesting that the Recurrence of unattained goals subscale should be eliminated. Measurement invariance across gender was also tested and received support. Convergent validity was assessed using average variance extracted and discriminant validity was examined via the Fornell–Larcker criterion, with most subscales meeting criteria, while a few subscale pairs displayed overlap that warrants further examination. Construct validity was further supported by correlations with established measures. While the instrument demonstrates promise for research and applied settings, additional work is required to strengthen its psychometric properties.</p>Ticu ConstantinGabriela Nicuță
Copyright (c) 2025 Psihologia Resurselor Umane
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2025-12-212025-12-2123210.24837/pru.v23i2.596