Toxic Leadership Scale-Romanian adaptation

Authors

  • Marian Popa Univesitatea din București
  • Violeta Rotărescu Univesitatea din București
  • Coralia Sulea Universitatea de Vest din Timișoara
  • Patricia Albulescu Universitatea de Vest din Timișoara

Keywords:

toxic leadership, job satisfaction, validity fidelity, scale adaptation

Abstract

The current study aims at developing a Romanian version of the Toxic Leadership Scale (TLS) (Schmidt, 2008), based on a five dimensions model: abusive leadership, authoritarian leadership, narcissism, self-promotion and unpredictability. The data were collected from a sample of 352 participants, based on the snowball technique. The analyses offered information about reliability, construct and criterion validity. Each scale dimension showed good reliability (between .82 and .90), and also the global scale had good reliability (.95). The construct validity was analyzed by looking at the negative correlations of the TLS with the scores of the Romanian versions of two scales, Leader Member Exchange (rmean =-.52) and Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (rmean=-.46), and also with a sexual harassment scale (rmean =-.37). The exploratory factor analysis on the Romanian scale items showed a four latent factors model that explained 58.43% of the total variance: self promotion, abusive leadership, unpredictability and authoritarianism. The criterion validity was indicated by the correlations with the satisfaction with the supervisor scale (between .47 and .56 for each of the 5 subscales and the TLS global score). Also we observed significant statistical differences, with above average effect sizes, between the participants with high turnover intent when compared with those with lower intent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marian Popa, Univesitatea din București

Univesitatea din București

Violeta Rotărescu, Univesitatea din București

Univesitatea din București

Coralia Sulea, Universitatea de Vest din Timișoara

Universitatea de Vest din Timișoara

Patricia Albulescu, Universitatea de Vest din Timișoara

Universitatea de Vest din Timișoara

References

Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The Prevalence of Destructive Leadership Behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21, 438-452.

Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, (47), 755-779.

Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), (http://www.eduneg.net/generaciondeteoria/files/1991-Bagozzi,%1920Yi,%1920Phillips.pdf).

Blanca, M. J., Arnau, J., López-Montiel, D., Bono, R., & Bendayan, R. (2013). Skewness and Kurtosis in Real Data Samples. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 9(2), 72-84. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000057

Byrne, B. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing Validity: Basic Issues in Objective Scale Development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319.

Conger, J. A. (1990). The dark side of leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(2), 44-55.

Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments: Theory and Application. Journal of Medicine, 119, 166.e167-166.e116.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and The Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika(16), 3.

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302 (http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Cronbach/construct.htm).

Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations - a longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, (31), 46-78.

Duhachek, A., & Iacobucci, D. (2004). Alpha’s Standard Error (ASE): An Accurate and Precise Confidence Interval Estimate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 792-808.

Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207-216.

Ferris, G. R., Zinko, R., Brouer, R. L., Buckley, M. R., & Harvey, M. G. (2007). Strategic bullying as a supplementary, balanced perspective on destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 195-206. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.004

Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. Paper presented at the Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Columbus, OH.

Goldman, A. (2009). Destructive Leaders and Dysfunctional Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Griffin, R. W., & O'Leary-Kelly, A. (Eds.). (2004). The Dark Side of Organizational Behavior. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin (103), 265-275.

Jaffe, G. (2011, June, 26). Army worries about ‘toxic leaders’ in ranks, The Washington Post. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/national-security/army-worries-about-toxic-leaders-inranks/2011/06/25/AGThw4kH_story.html

Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad Leadership: What It Is, How It Happens: @ Kellerman, Barbara.

Kets de Vries, M. F. R., & Miller, D. (1985). Narcissism and leadership: An object relations perspective. Human Relations, 38(6), 583-601.

Knapp, T. (2013). The Reliability of Measuring Instruments (3rd ed.): Edgeworth Laboratory.

Koning, A. J., & Franses, P. H. (2003). Confidence Intervals for Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha Values: Erasmus Research Institute of Management: Report Series Research in Management (RS-2003-041-MKT) (http://publishing.eur.nl/ir/repub/asset/431/ERS-2003-041-MKT.pdf).

Krasikova, D. (2011). Predictors of destructive leadership and followers' responses to its manifestations. Purdue University, United States -Indiana.

Lipman-Blumen, J. (2004). The Allure of Toxic Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). Toxic Leadership: A - Conceptual Framework Encyclopedia of Executive Governance.

Muenjohn, N., & Armstrong, A. (2008). Evaluating the Structural Validity of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), Capturing the Leadership Factors of Transformational-Transactional Leadership. Contemporary Management Research, 4(1), 3-14.

O'Connor, J., Mumford, M. D., Clifton, T. C., Gessner, T. L., & Connelly, M. S. (1995). Charismatic leaders and destructiveness: An historiometric study. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 529-555.

Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176-194. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.001

Pfister, A. (2011). Destructive Leadership And Its Consequences In The Swiss Armed Forces. Paper presented at the Conference of International Military Testing Association, South Kuta, Bali, Indonesia.

Popa, M. (2012). Psihologie militară. Iași: Polirom.

Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2010). Power comparisons of some selected normality tests. Paper presented at the Regional Conference on Statistical Sciences, Malaysia.

Reed, G. E. (2004). Toxic leadership. Military Review, July-August, 67-71.

Reed, G. E. (2010). Toxic Leadership: Part Deux. Military Review, November-December, 58-64.

Sankowsky, D. (1995). The charismatic leader as narcissist: Understanding the abuse of power. Organizational Dynamics, 23(4), 57-71.

Scandura, T. A. (1994). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Scale. The SelectedWorks of Terri A. Scandura Available at: http://works.bepress.com/terri_scandura/11.

Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). The moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology (69), 428-436.

Schmidt, A. A. (2008). Development and validation of the Toxic Leadership Scale. (Master of Science), University of Maryland, College Park. (http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/8176/1/umi-umd-5358.pdf)

Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350-353.

Snook, S. C., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1989). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: A Monte Carlo study. Psychological Bulletin, (106), 148-154.

Tan, M., & Gould, J. (2011). Army wants to rid top ranks of toxic leaders. Army Times, (July, 31). (http://www.armytimes.com/news/2011/07/armywants-to-rid-ranks-of-toxic-commanders-073111w/)

Tan, Ș. (2009). Misuses of KR-20 and Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficients. Education and Science, 34(152), 101-112 (http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/viewFile/595/175).

Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, (43), 178-190.

Tepper, B. J. (2007). Journal of Management. Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations. Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda, (33), 261-289.

Whicker , M. (1996). The Toxic Boss Syndrome. (http://management.about.com)

Downloads

Published

2019-10-24

How to Cite

Popa, M., Rotărescu, V., Sulea, C., & Albulescu, P. (2019). Toxic Leadership Scale-Romanian adaptation. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 11(2), 57–70. Retrieved from https://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/182

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>