LATURA ÎNTUNECATĂ A ORGANIZAŢIILOR: COMPORTAMENTUL CONTRAPRODUCTIV LA LOCUL DE MUNCĂ
Keywords:
counterproductive behavior, workplace deviance, theory of planned behavior, causal reasoning process, typology of workplace devianceAbstract
Employees coming in late or leaving early, taking excessive breaks; employees working on personal business at the workplace or intentionally making errors and employees verbally aggressing colleagues represent just a sample of intentional workplace behaviors individuals are displaying in their organization with the potential to cause damage to the organization or to its members.
This article aims at highlighting the main dimensions of counterproductive behavior in organizations and most relevant explanatory models. Also an analysis of main predictors and will be presented. As concluding arguments consequences, implications and possible recommendations for managers and employees’ supervisors will be presented.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision process , 10, 179-211
Bennett, R., Robinson, S. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (3), 349-360
Bennett, R., Robinson, S. (*). The Past, Present and Future of Workplace Deviance Research. In J. Greenberg (Ed.) Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science, 2nd edition, în curs de publicare
Gruys, M., Sackett, P. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,11 (1), 30-42
Hakstian, R., Farrell, S., Tweed, R. (2002). The assessment of counterproductive tendencies by means of the California Psychological Inventory, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10 (1/2)
Jones, D. (2003). Predicting retaliation in the workplace: The theory of planned behavior and organizational justice, Academy of Management Best Conference Paper OB: L1
Martinko, M., Gundlach, M., Douglas, S. (2002). Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: a causal reasoning perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10 (1/2), 36-50
Mikulay S., Neuman, G., Finkelstein, L. (2001). Counterproductive workplace behaviors. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 127 (3), 279-300
Robinson, S., Bennett, R. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: a multidimensional scaling study, Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2), 555-572
Warren, D. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of management Review 28 (4), 622-632.
Robinson, S., O’Leary, A. (1998) Monkey see, monkey do: the influence of workgroups on the antisocial behahavior of employees, Academy of Management Journal, 41 (6), 658-673.
Zapf, D. (1999). Organizational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20 (1/2), 7.
Sackett, P. (2002). The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10 (1/2), 5-11.
Vardi, Y., Wiener, Y. (1996). Misbehavior in organizations, Organization Science, 7 (2)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal,it also allows for use of the work for non-commercial purposes and if others remix, transform or build upon the works found in this journal they must distribute the contributions under the same licence as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See: The Effect of Open Access).
