Introducere în metaanaliză. Metaanaliza corelațiilor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24837/pru.v6i2.370Keywords:
meta-analysis, correlations, statistical methodsAbstract
The present paper discusses the fundamental principles of meta-analysis, as a statistical method for summarising results of correlational studies. We approach fundamental issues such as: the finality of meta-analysis and the problems associated with study artefacts. The paper also contains recommendations for: selecting the studies for meta-analysis, identifying the relevant information within these studies, computing mean effect sizes, confidence intervals and heterogeneity indexes of the mean effect size. Finally, we present indications for reporting meta-analysis results.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Albu, M. (1998). Construirea si utilizarea testelor psihologice. Cluj Napoca: Clusium.
Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship between the big five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 336-355.
Avery, D.R. (2003). Personality as a Predictor of the Value of Voice. The Journal of Psychology, 137, 435-446.
Aziz, S. & Jackson, C.J. (2001). A comparison between three and five factor models of Pakistani personality data. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1311-1319.
Bartone, P.T., Snook, S.A. & Tremble, T.R. (2002). Cognitive and Personality Predictors of Leader Performance in West Point Cadets. Military Psychology, 14, 321-338.
Becker, P. (1999). Beyond the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 511-530.
Bennett, R.J. & Robinson, S.L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (3), 349-360.
Bernard, N.S., Dollinger, S.J. & Ramaniah, N.V. (2002). Applying the Big Five Personality Factors to the Impostor Phenomenon. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 321-333.
Borenstein, M., Rothstein, H., & Cohen, J. (2001) Power and Precision. Disponibil la:
www.poweranalysis.com.
Chapman, B.P. & Hayslip, B. (2005). Incremental Validy of a Measure of Emotional
Intelligence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 154-169.
Constantin, T. (2004). Evaluarea psihologică a personalului. Iasi: Polirom.
Conte, J.M. & Jacobs, R.R. (2003). Validity Evidence Linking Polychromicity and Big Five Personality Dimensions to Absence, Lateness, and Supervisory Performance
Ratings. Human Performance, 16, 107-129.
Cronbach, L.J. & Shavelson, R.J. (2004). My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391-418.
De Leeuw, E.D. & Hox, J.J. (2003). The Use of Meta-Analysis In Cross-National Studies. în Harkness, J.A., van de Vijver, F.J.R. & Mohler, P.Ph. (coord.) Cross-Cultural Survey Methods, New York: Wiley.
DeYoung, C.G., Peterson, J.B. & Higgins, D.M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533-552.
Durlak, J.A. (2005). Basic Principles of Metaanalysis. în Roberts, M.C. & Ilardi, S.S. (coord.): Handbook of research methods in Clinical Psychology, Blackwell Publishing House.
Dwight, S.A., Cummings, K.M. & Glenar, J.L.(1998). Comparison of Criterion-Related Validity Coefficients for the Mini-Markers and Goldberg’s Markers of the Big Five Personality Factors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 541-550.
Ebert, S.A., Tucker, D.C. & Roth, D.L. (2002). Psychological resistance factors as
predictors of general health status and physical symptom reporting. Pychology,
Health and Medicine, 7, 363-375.
Eden, D. (2002). Replication, Meta-Analysis, Scientific Progress and AMJ’s Publication Policy. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 841-846.
Faul, F. & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn University, Dept. of Psychology, Bonn.
Gelade, G.A. (2002). Creative Style, Personality, and Artistic Endeavor. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 128, 213-234.
Graziano, W.G. & Tobin, R.M. (2002). Agreableness: Dimension of Personality or
Social Desirability Artifact? Journal of Personality, 70, 695-728.
Greenland, S., O’Rourke, K. (2001). On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions. Biostatistics, 2, 463-471.
Hohn, M., Vârgă, D. & Măruster, L. (1999). Curs de statistică aplicată în stiințe sociale. Volumul II, Timisoara: Tipografia Universității de Vest.
Hox, J.J. (1995) Applied Multilevel Analysis, Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties
Huffcutt, A.I. (2007). Research Perspectives on Meta-analyis. în Rogelberg, S.G. (coord.). Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Blackwell Publishing House.
Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (2000). Fixed Effects vs/ Random Effects Meta-Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 275-292.
Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of Meta-Analysis. Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishers.
Kelly, K.R. & Pulver, C.A. (2003). Refining measurement of career indecision types: A validity study. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 445-454.
Kirk, R.E. (2005). The Importance of Effect Magnitude. În Davis, S.F. (coord.) Handbook of Research Methods in Experimental Psychology. Blackwell Publishing House.
Kwapil, T.R., Wrobel, M.J. & Pope, C.A. (2002). The five-factor personality structure of dissociative experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 431-443.
Lievens, F., DeFruyt, F. & VanDam, K. (2001). Assessors’ use of personality traits in descriptions of assessment centre candidates: A five-factor model perspective.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 623-636.
Lipsey, M.W. & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical Metaanalysis. Sage.
Lounsbury, J.W., Loveland, J.M. & Gibson, L.W. (2003). An Investigation of Psychological Sense of Community in Relation to Big Five Personality Traits. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 531-541.
Mak, A.S., Tran, C. (2001). Big five personality and cultural relocation factors in Vietnamese Australian student’s intercultural social selfefficacy. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 181-201.
MaricuŃoiu, L.P & Sava, F.A. (2007). PowerStaTim 1.0 – Analiza puterii statistice si a mărimii efectului. Disponibil la: www.psihologietm.ro începând cu data de 1.07.2008.
Meyer, T.D. (2002). The Hypomanic Personality Scale, the Big Five, and their relationship to depression and mania. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 649-660.
Miclea, M. (1994). „Meta-analiza”. în Radu, I. (coord.). Metodologia cercetării si analiza datelor, Cluj Napoca, p.309-334.
Mullen, B. (1989). Basic Advanced Meta-analysis. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
O’Brien, T.B. & DeLongis, A. (1996). The Interactional Context of Problem-Emotion,
and Relationship-Focused Coping: The Role of the Big Five Personality Factors. Journal of Personality, 64, 775-813.
Penley, J.A. & Tomaka, J. (2002). Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1215-1228.
Pitariu, H.D., Sulea, C., Zaborilă, C., Maricuțoiu,
L.P. (2008). Justiție organizațională si afectivitate negativă: o metaanaliză a relației
acestora cu comportamentele contraproductive. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 6, p.34-46.
Popa, R.I., Negoescu, L., Plesea, S. & Maricuțoiu, L.P. (2008). Personalitate si leadership transformațional: o metaanaliză. Lucrare prezentată în cadrul Ediției a IV-a a Conferinței Naționale de Psihologie, Timisoara 23-25 mai 2008.
Robins, R.W., Fraley, R.C., Roberts, B.W. & Trzesniewski, K.H. (2004). A Longitudinal
Study of Personality Change in Young Adulthood. Journal of Personality, 69, 617-
640.
Rose, C.L., Murphy, L.B., Byard, L. & Nikzad, K. (2002). The Role of the Big Five Personality Factors in Vigilance Performance and Workload. European Journal of Personality, 16, 185-200.
Rosenthal, D.A., Hoyt, W.T., Ferrin, J.M., Miller, S. & Cohen, N.D. (2006). Advanced Methods in Meta-Analytic Research: Applications and Implications for Rehabilitation Counseling Research. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 49, 243-246.
Rosenthal, R. & DiMatteo, M.R. (2001). Metaanalysis: Recent Developments in
QuantitativeMethods for Literature Reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-82.
Rusu, A., Macavei, B., Moldovan, R. & Pintea, S. (2008). Încorporarea terapiei asistate pe animale în tratamentul psihoterapeutic al depresiei: investigație meta-analitică. Lucrare prezentată în cadrul Ediției a IV-a a Conferinței Naționale de Psihologie, Timisoara 23-25 mai 2008.
Sadowski, C.J. & Cogburn, H.E. (1997). Need for Cognition in the Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Psychology, 131, 307-312.
Sava, F. (2004). Analiza datelor în cercetarea psihologică. Metode statistice complementare, Cluj Napoca: A.S.C.R.
Sava, F.A & Maricuțoiu, L.P. (2007). PowerStaTim 1.0. – Manualul utilizatorului. Timisoara: Editura Universității de Vest.
Schmidt, F.L. & Hunter, J.E. (2003). Meta-analysis. în Schinka, J.A.& Velicer, W.F. (coord.) Handbook of Psychology. Volume 2: Research Methods in Psychology, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Shafer, A.B. (2001). The Big Five and Sexuality Trait Terms as Predictors of Relationships and Sex. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 313-338.
Spector, P.E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruusema, K., Goh, A. & Kessler, S. (2006). The
dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 446-460.
Stan, A. (2002). Testul psihologic. Evoluție, construcție, aplicații. Iasi: Polirom.
Thompson, R.L., Brossart, D.F., Carlozzi, A.F. & Miville, M.L. (2002). Five-Factor Model (Big Five) Personality Traits and Universal-Diverse Orientation in Counselor Trainees. The Journal of Personality, 136, 561-572.
Thoms, P., Moore, K.S. & Scott, K.S. (1996). The relationship between self-efficacy for participating in self-managed workgroups and the big five personality dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 349-361.
Trip, S. (2006). Metaanalysis of rational emotive education studies with children and adolescents. Lucrare prezentată în cadrul Ediției a III-a a Conferinței Naționale de Psihologie, Cluj Napoca, 18-21 mai 2006.
Trull, T.J. & Geary, D.C. (1997). Comparison of the Big Five Factor Structure Across Samples of Chinese and American Adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 324-341.
Tsaousis, I. & Nikolaou, I.E.(2001). The Stability of the Five Factor Model of Personality in Personnel Selection and Assessment in Greece. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 290-301.
Tute, T.L. & Bosnjak, M. (2001). Understanding differences in web usage: the role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 391-398.
Urbina, S. (2004). Essential of Psychological Testing. New Jersey: Wiley.
Wilson, R.S., Mendes de Leon, C.F., Bienias, J.L., Evans, D.A. & Bennett, D.A. (2004). Personality and Mortality in Old Age, The Journals of Gerontology, 59B, 110-116.
Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship between the big five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 336-355.
Avery, D.R. (2003). Personality as a Predictor of the Value of Voice. The Journal of Psychology, 137, 435-446.
Aziz, S. & Jackson, C.J. (2001). A comparison between three and five factor models of Pakistani personality data. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1311-1319.
Bartone, P.T., Snook, S.A. & Tremble, T.R. (2002). Cognitive and Personality Predictors of Leader Performance in West Point Cadets. Military Psychology, 14, 321-338.
Becker, P. (1999). Beyond the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 511-530.
Bennett, R.J. & Robinson, S.L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (3), 349-360.
Bernard, N.S., Dollinger, S.J. & Ramaniah, N.V. (2002). Applying the Big Five Personality Factors to the Impostor Phenomenon. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 321-333.
Borenstein, M., Rothstein, H., & Cohen, J. (2001) Power and Precision. Disponibil la:
www.poweranalysis.com.
Chapman, B.P. & Hayslip, B. (2005). Incremental Validy of a Measure of Emotional
Intelligence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 154-169.
Constantin, T. (2004). Evaluarea psihologică a personalului. Iasi: Polirom.
Conte, J.M. & Jacobs, R.R. (2003). Validity Evidence Linking Polychromicity and Big Five Personality Dimensions to Absence, Lateness, and Supervisory Performance
Ratings. Human Performance, 16, 107-129.
Cronbach, L.J. & Shavelson, R.J. (2004). My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391-418.
De Leeuw, E.D. & Hox, J.J. (2003). The Use of Meta-Analysis In Cross-National Studies. în Harkness, J.A., van de Vijver, F.J.R. & Mohler, P.Ph. (coord.) Cross-Cultural Survey Methods, New York: Wiley.
DeYoung, C.G., Peterson, J.B. & Higgins, D.M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533-552.
Durlak, J.A. (2005). Basic Principles of Metaanalysis. în Roberts, M.C. & Ilardi, S.S. (coord.): Handbook of research methods in Clinical Psychology, Blackwell Publishing House.
Dwight, S.A., Cummings, K.M. & Glenar, J.L.(1998). Comparison of Criterion-Related Validity Coefficients for the Mini-Markers and Goldberg’s Markers of the Big Five Personality Factors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 541-550.
Ebert, S.A., Tucker, D.C. & Roth, D.L. (2002). Psychological resistance factors as
predictors of general health status and physical symptom reporting. Pychology,
Health and Medicine, 7, 363-375.
Eden, D. (2002). Replication, Meta-Analysis, Scientific Progress and AMJ’s Publication Policy. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 841-846.
Faul, F. & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn University, Dept. of Psychology, Bonn.
Gelade, G.A. (2002). Creative Style, Personality, and Artistic Endeavor. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 128, 213-234.
Graziano, W.G. & Tobin, R.M. (2002). Agreableness: Dimension of Personality or
Social Desirability Artifact? Journal of Personality, 70, 695-728.
Greenland, S., O’Rourke, K. (2001). On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions. Biostatistics, 2, 463-471.
Hohn, M., Vârgă, D. & Măruster, L. (1999). Curs de statistică aplicată în stiințe sociale. Volumul II, Timisoara: Tipografia Universității de Vest.
Hox, J.J. (1995) Applied Multilevel Analysis, Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties
Huffcutt, A.I. (2007). Research Perspectives on Meta-analyis. în Rogelberg, S.G. (coord.). Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Blackwell Publishing House.
Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (2000). Fixed Effects vs/ Random Effects Meta-Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 275-292.
Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of Meta-Analysis. Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishers.
Kelly, K.R. & Pulver, C.A. (2003). Refining measurement of career indecision types: A validity study. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 445-454.
Kirk, R.E. (2005). The Importance of Effect Magnitude. În Davis, S.F. (coord.) Handbook of Research Methods in Experimental Psychology. Blackwell Publishing House.
Kwapil, T.R., Wrobel, M.J. & Pope, C.A. (2002). The five-factor personality structure of dissociative experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 431-443.
Lievens, F., DeFruyt, F. & VanDam, K. (2001). Assessors’ use of personality traits in descriptions of assessment centre candidates: A five-factor model perspective.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 623-636.
Lipsey, M.W. & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical Metaanalysis. Sage.
Lounsbury, J.W., Loveland, J.M. & Gibson, L.W. (2003). An Investigation of Psychological Sense of Community in Relation to Big Five Personality Traits. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 531-541.
Mak, A.S., Tran, C. (2001). Big five personality and cultural relocation factors in Vietnamese Australian student’s intercultural social selfefficacy. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 181-201.
MaricuŃoiu, L.P & Sava, F.A. (2007). PowerStaTim 1.0 – Analiza puterii statistice si a mărimii efectului. Disponibil la: www.psihologietm.ro începând cu data de 1.07.2008.
Meyer, T.D. (2002). The Hypomanic Personality Scale, the Big Five, and their relationship to depression and mania. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 649-660.
Miclea, M. (1994). „Meta-analiza”. în Radu, I. (coord.). Metodologia cercetării si analiza datelor, Cluj Napoca, p.309-334.
Mullen, B. (1989). Basic Advanced Meta-analysis. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
O’Brien, T.B. & DeLongis, A. (1996). The Interactional Context of Problem-Emotion,
and Relationship-Focused Coping: The Role of the Big Five Personality Factors. Journal of Personality, 64, 775-813.
Penley, J.A. & Tomaka, J. (2002). Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1215-1228.
Pitariu, H.D., Sulea, C., Zaborilă, C., Maricuțoiu,
L.P. (2008). Justiție organizațională si afectivitate negativă: o metaanaliză a relației
acestora cu comportamentele contraproductive. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 6, p.34-46.
Popa, R.I., Negoescu, L., Plesea, S. & Maricuțoiu, L.P. (2008). Personalitate si leadership transformațional: o metaanaliză. Lucrare prezentată în cadrul Ediției a IV-a a Conferinței Naționale de Psihologie, Timisoara 23-25 mai 2008.
Robins, R.W., Fraley, R.C., Roberts, B.W. & Trzesniewski, K.H. (2004). A Longitudinal
Study of Personality Change in Young Adulthood. Journal of Personality, 69, 617-
640.
Rose, C.L., Murphy, L.B., Byard, L. & Nikzad, K. (2002). The Role of the Big Five Personality Factors in Vigilance Performance and Workload. European Journal of Personality, 16, 185-200.
Rosenthal, D.A., Hoyt, W.T., Ferrin, J.M., Miller, S. & Cohen, N.D. (2006). Advanced Methods in Meta-Analytic Research: Applications and Implications for Rehabilitation Counseling Research. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 49, 243-246.
Rosenthal, R. & DiMatteo, M.R. (2001). Metaanalysis: Recent Developments in
QuantitativeMethods for Literature Reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-82.
Rusu, A., Macavei, B., Moldovan, R. & Pintea, S. (2008). Încorporarea terapiei asistate pe animale în tratamentul psihoterapeutic al depresiei: investigație meta-analitică. Lucrare prezentată în cadrul Ediției a IV-a a Conferinței Naționale de Psihologie, Timisoara 23-25 mai 2008.
Sadowski, C.J. & Cogburn, H.E. (1997). Need for Cognition in the Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Psychology, 131, 307-312.
Sava, F. (2004). Analiza datelor în cercetarea psihologică. Metode statistice complementare, Cluj Napoca: A.S.C.R.
Sava, F.A & Maricuțoiu, L.P. (2007). PowerStaTim 1.0. – Manualul utilizatorului. Timisoara: Editura Universității de Vest.
Schmidt, F.L. & Hunter, J.E. (2003). Meta-analysis. în Schinka, J.A.& Velicer, W.F. (coord.) Handbook of Psychology. Volume 2: Research Methods in Psychology, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Shafer, A.B. (2001). The Big Five and Sexuality Trait Terms as Predictors of Relationships and Sex. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 313-338.
Spector, P.E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruusema, K., Goh, A. & Kessler, S. (2006). The
dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 446-460.
Stan, A. (2002). Testul psihologic. Evoluție, construcție, aplicații. Iasi: Polirom.
Thompson, R.L., Brossart, D.F., Carlozzi, A.F. & Miville, M.L. (2002). Five-Factor Model (Big Five) Personality Traits and Universal-Diverse Orientation in Counselor Trainees. The Journal of Personality, 136, 561-572.
Thoms, P., Moore, K.S. & Scott, K.S. (1996). The relationship between self-efficacy for participating in self-managed workgroups and the big five personality dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 349-361.
Trip, S. (2006). Metaanalysis of rational emotive education studies with children and adolescents. Lucrare prezentată în cadrul Ediției a III-a a Conferinței Naționale de Psihologie, Cluj Napoca, 18-21 mai 2006.
Trull, T.J. & Geary, D.C. (1997). Comparison of the Big Five Factor Structure Across Samples of Chinese and American Adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 324-341.
Tsaousis, I. & Nikolaou, I.E.(2001). The Stability of the Five Factor Model of Personality in Personnel Selection and Assessment in Greece. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 290-301.
Tute, T.L. & Bosnjak, M. (2001). Understanding differences in web usage: the role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 391-398.
Urbina, S. (2004). Essential of Psychological Testing. New Jersey: Wiley.
Wilson, R.S., Mendes de Leon, C.F., Bienias, J.L., Evans, D.A. & Bennett, D.A. (2004). Personality and Mortality in Old Age, The Journals of Gerontology, 59B, 110-116.
Downloads
Published
2020-01-24
How to Cite
Maricuțoiu, L. (2020). Introducere în metaanaliză. Metaanaliza corelațiilor. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 6(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.24837/pru.v6i2.370
Issue
Section
Methodology
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal,it also allows for use of the work for non-commercial purposes and if others remix, transform or build upon the works found in this journal they must distribute the contributions under the same licence as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See: The Effect of Open Access).
