ALL’S FAIR IN WAR? FAIRNESS AS VIEWED FROM THE MILITARY
Keywords:
military, psychologyAbstract
Paper presented as part of Playing Fair: Juggling Multiple Views of Fairness Symposium at the 110th American Psychological Association (APA) Convention, Chicago, Illinois; August 22, 2002. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Naval Postgraduate School, the National Defense University, the U.S. Military Services, or the Department of Defense
Downloads
References
Arabian, J.M., & Welsh, J.R. (2000). Impact of Science and Technical Tests on Job Classification in the U.S. Military. Paper presented at the International Military Testing Association
Army Research Institute. (1977 ). Women content in units force development test (MAXWAC). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H., & Sager, C.E. (1993). “A Theory of Performance,” in N. Schmidt & W.C., Borman (Eds.). Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp.35-70.
Congressional Commission on Military Training and Gender-Related Issues. (1999). Final report: Findings and recommendations (Volume I). Arlington, VA: Author.
Dansby, M., Laurence, J.H., & Wetzel, E. (1999). Military Equal Opportunity Climate Survey (MEOCS): Overview of results related to the CMTGRI. In Congressional Commission on Military Training and Gender-Related Issues, Final report: Research projects, reports, and studies (Volume IV, pp. 689-723). Arlington, VA: Author.
Department of Defense. (2001). Population representation in the Military Services: Fiscal Year 2000. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy).
Department of Defense. (1999). Career progression of minority and women officers. Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness).
Harrell, M.C., & Miller, L.L. (1999). New opportunities for military women: Effects upon readiness, cohesion, and morale. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Mason, R., Kavee, J., Wheeless, S., George, B., Riemer, R., & Elig, T. (1996). The 1995 Armed Forces sexual harassment survey: Statistical methodology report (DMDC Report No. 96-016). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
Mottern, J., Foster, D., Brady, E., & Marshall-Mies, J. (1997). The 1995 gender integration basic combat training study (Study Report 97-01). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Wise, L., Welsh, J. R., Grafton, F., Foley, P., Earles, J., Sawin, L., & Divgi, D. R. (1992). Sensitivity and fairness of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) technical composites (DMDC TR 92-002). Monterey, CA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal,it also allows for use of the work for non-commercial purposes and if others remix, transform or build upon the works found in this journal they must distribute the contributions under the same licence as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See: The Effect of Open Access).
