Social utility and desirability of internal and external employees: insights for collaboration at work
Keywords:
internality, social desirability, social utilityAbstract
Numerous studies have shown that internal explanations are preferred to external ones. After taking into consideration that this emphasis of the actor’s importance resulted from a bias, it was argued that it was rather the proof of a social norm: the norm of internality. Nevertheless, research tending to highlight the existence of this norm seems, in the case of certain authors, to be accompanied by a methodological bias that invalidates them. However, to confer on an object the status of a social norm means to assign a value (in terms of desirability and utility) to that object. This study aims to verify once more the existence of an internality norm, by employing a novel procedure of examining the value attributed to internality. One hundred and seventy employees were questioned on the desirability and utility they would confer to a future work colleague. They had to assess the social value of a future co-worker on the basis of the answers given by this colleague to an internality / externality questionnaire. The results show that the internal individuals are almost always preferred to external ones, both in terms of desirability and utility, regardless of the future status (peer vs. subordinate) of that collaborator. But it should be emphasized that this preference for the internal individuals is solely a function of a predominance of the positive judgments passed on the internal individuals, and not of a negative evaluation of the external ones. This means that the external ones are not stigmatized.
Downloads
References
Beauvois, J-L. (1976). Problématiques des conduites sociales d'évaluation. Connexions, 19, 7–30.
Beauvois, J-L. (1984). La psychologie quotidienne. Paris: PUF.
Beauvois, J-L. (1995). La connaissance des utilités sociales. Psychologie française, 40, 375–388.
Beauvois, J. L., Bourjade, A., & Pansu, P. (1991). Norme d'internalité et évaluation professionnelle. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 4(1-2), 9–28.
Beauvois, J-L., Dubois, N., & Peeters, G. (1999). L'évaluation personnologique. In J-L. Beauvois, N. Dubois & W. Doise (Eds). La construction sociale de la personne. Grenoble: PUG, 259–279.
Beauvois J.-L. & Le Poultier F. (1986) Norme d’internalité et pouvoir en psychologie quotidienne. Recherches sur la psychologie de tous les jours. Revue Française de Psychologie 31, 2 (100-108).
Bressoux, P., & Pansu, P. (1998). Norme d’internalité et activités évaluatives en milieu scolaire. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 122, 19–29.
Bressoux, P., & Pansu, P. (2003). Quand les enseignants jugent leurs élèves. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Beauvois, J. L., Gilibert, D., Pansu, P., & Abdelaoui, S. (1998). Internality attribution and intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(2), 123–140.
Cambon, L., Djouary, N., & Beauvois, J-L. (2006). Social norms of judgment and social utility: when it is more profitable to be useful than desirable. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 167–180.
Cassignol-Bertrand, F., & Constant, E. (2007). La norme de motivation intrinsèque : valorisation, utilité et désirabilité sociales, Bulletin de psychologie, 448(2), 121–133.
Cueillens, C., & Castra, D. (1998). Norme d’internalité et sphères de vie. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 4(1-2), 44–53.
Dagot, L., & Castra, D. (2002). L'allégeance : un principe des logiques d'aide à l'insertion professionnelle. L'orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 31(3), 417–442.
Delmas, F. (2009). La norme d’internalité : critique de la méthode. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 39–73.
Desrumaux, P. (2005). Informations normatives et stéréotypiques: effets de l’internalité/externalité, du genre, de l’apparence physique et du type hiérarchique et sexuel du poste sur les décisions de recrutement. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 18(4), 165–199.
Dompnier, B., & Pansu. P. (2007). L'intervention des explications internes en termes d'effort dans les stratégies d'autoprésentation et le jugement social : perspectives sociocognitives. Psychologie française, 52(4), 459–478.
Dompnier, B., & Pansu, P. (2010). La valeur sociale des explications causales en contexte éducatif: autoprésentation des élèves et représentation des enseignants. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69(1), 37–49.
Dubois, N. (1987). La psychologie du contrôle : les croyances internes et externes. Grenoble: PUG.
Dubois, N. (1994). La norme d’internalité et le libéralisme. Grenoble: PUG
Dubois, N., & Le Poultier, F. (1991). Internalité et évaluation scolaire. In J. L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule & J. M. Monteil (dir.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (Vol. 3, p. 153–166). Cousset: DelVal.
Gangloff, B. (1997). Les implications théoriques d'un choix d'items : de la norme d'internalité à la norme d'allégeance. Pratiques Psychologiques, 2, 99–106.
Gangloff, B. (2010). Utilité et désirabilité d’informations normatives sur des subordonnés et des collègues de travail. Les cahiers de Psychologie Politique, n°17. [http://www.cahierspsypol.fr].
Gangloff, B., & Mazilescu, C-A. (2015). Is it desirable or useful to believe in a just world? Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 51,150–161.
Gangloff, B., & Sourisse, M. (1995). Influence de la durée du chômage et des stages chômeurs longue durée sur l'évolution du conformisme à la norme d'internalité. Psychologie et Psychométrie, Revue de Langue Française, 16(3), 5–19.
Grimault, V. (2015). La dichotomie entre les jugements d’utilité et de désirabilité relative aux normes sociales. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 10.
Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality, Psychological Review, 51, 358–374.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New-York: Wiley.
Jellison, J.M., & Green, J. (1981). A self-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: the norm of internality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 4, 643–649.
Jones, E.E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist, 34(2), 107–117.
Jones, E.E., & Davis, K.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions. The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. New-York: Academic Press, vol. 2, 219–266.
Jouffre, S., Py, J., & Somat, A. (2008). Academic judgment and institutional evaluation made by teachers according to pupils’ explanatory activity. European Journal of Psychology Education, 23(4), 399–420.
Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution in social psychology. In L. Levine (Ed.). Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, vol. 15, 192–238.
Langer E.J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (2), 311–328.
Le Barbenchon, E., Cambon, L., & Lavigne, F. (2005). Désirabilité et utilité sociale de 308 adjectifs de personnalité et 297 professions. L'année Psychologique, 105, 307–322.
Lecigne, A. (2008). Allégeance à l'école et intérêt de l'enfant : le cas de Jean. Le Journal des Psychologues, 58, 68–71.
Lefcourt, H. M. (1966). Internal vs external control of reinforcement; A review. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 206–220.
Lerner, M.J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355–360.
Lerner, M.J., & Simmons C.H. (1966). Observer's reaction to the «innocent victim»: compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(2), 203–210.
Louche, C. (1998). The norm of internality and coordination mechanisms in organizations. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 48(3), 189–192.
Mazilescu, C-A., Abdellaoui, S., & Gangloff, B. (2012). Assessing the Social Value of Personality Information. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 38, 91–106.
Mazilescu, C-A., & Gangloff, B. (2012). Natural descriptors: a study on social desirability and social utility. International Journal of Academic Research, 4(2), 11–16.
Mazilescu, C-A., Gangloff, B. & Auzoult, L. (2011). Désirabilité et utilité sociales des traits du Big Five. Psihologia Sociala, 28(11), 33–51.
Nietzsche, F. (Ed. française 1968). Humain trop Humain. Paris: Gallimard, vol 1.
Pansu, P. (1994). La norme d'internalité et le jugement sur la valeur professionnelle. Thèse de Doctorat, document non publié. Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale. Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble 2.
Pansu, P. (1997). Norme d’internalité et appréciation de la valeur professionnelle : l’effet des explications internes dans l’appréciation du personnel. Le Travail Humain, 60(2), 205–222.
Pansu, P., & Gilibert, D. (2002). Effect of causal explanations on work-related judgment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(4), 505–526. doi: 10.1111/1464-0597.00105
Pansu, P., Tarquinio, C., & Gilibert, D. (2005). Internal attributions in an intergroup business setting. Le Travail Humain, 68(1), 55–72.
Peeters, G. (1986). Good and evil as softwares of the brain: on psychological immediates underlying the metaphysical ultimates. Interdisciplinarystudies in the philosophy of understanding, 9, 210–231.
Py J. & Somat A. (1991). Normativité, conformité et clairvoyance : leurs effets sur le jugement évaluatif dans un contexte scolaire. In Beauvois (J.L.), Joule (R.V.) et Monteil (J.M.) (Eds), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales, 3, 167-193.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings : distorsions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. New-York: Academic Press, vol.10, 173–220.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(609), 1–28.
Shaver, K.G. (1970). Defensive attribution: effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(2), 101–113.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal,it also allows for use of the work for non-commercial purposes and if others remix, transform or build upon the works found in this journal they must distribute the contributions under the same licence as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See: The Effect of Open Access).
